Arsenal reacquaint themselves with the self-destruct button

While Arsenal have made mistakes in recent years in the round of 16 in the Champions League, the calibre of the opposition has offered some perspective and comfort to those exits from the tournament. This year, there is no comfort.

The Gunners aren’t out yet, but the likelihood of turning around a 3-1 defecit away to Monaco is low, especially given the defensive record of the Ligue 1 team.

To say the game on Wednesday night was frustrating is a huge understatement, as while it was on the face of it was a completely calamitous performance from Arsenal, if the finishing had been better, Arsene Wenger’s team surely wouldn’t have left themselves so open at the back. Despite being dreadful, and most players being some way off their best, Arsenal still created clear chances. That does offer a crumb of comfort for the second leg as, if Arsenal can play to their full potential, I definitely believe they can score three goals. But it’s the sort of crumb you’d find down the back of the sofa from a biscuit you’re allergic to, so it isn’t actually much comfort at all.

It feels slightly futile to pick out certain players, because no Arsenal player comes out of the game with any credit, but there were a few performances that stuck out particularly badly. Olivier Giroud, having enjoyed his best spell of form as an Arsenal player, completely melted down. It was painful to watch a striker have all the confidence drain out of him with almost every touch of the ball. Nothing came off for him, with the miss from eight yards with the goal at his mercy horribly summing up his evening. He’s been vital for the Gunners in recent weeks, so hopefully it won’t take him a long time to recover from that performance. I fear it will though.

David Ospina, after a slightly shaky performance at times against Crystal Palace, should be very disappointed with the first and third goals. While Kondogbia’s long range shot did take a deflection off Per Mertesacker, I can’t work out why Ospina resigned himself to not being able to save the ball. It ended up going in just past his head, so it was bizarre to see him not make an attempt to save it. He also seemed slow to dive for the third goal, and while that might seem harsh, it was a shot that a top goalkeeper should save. I said after Palace that a mistake could see Szczesny reinstated, so I would not be surprised if the Pole is back in goal against Everton on Sunday.

I’ve read a lot of criticism of Per Mertesacker after the game, and he was horribly exposed on the counter-attack with his lack of pace. But I don’t think he was helped by those around him. In particular, I thought Hector Bellerin looked like an inexperienced 19 year-old, and too often in the second half went missing. He’s been excellent since coming into the team, but Wednesday was a reminder of how he still has a lot to learn, especially defensively.

It was almost as if Arsenal had forgotten how to play against a team that was only interested in defending. The recent good run of form has generally been against teams that have looked to attack Arsenal. Even sides like Leicester and Aston Villa have had a good amount of possession. In those cases, Arsenal had been comfortable to not have as much of the ball, have a good system defensively, and then release the quick attacking players into space. Monaco had no interest in keeping the ball, so suddenly all the emphasis was on Arsenal to force the issue, and having gone 1-0 down, Arsenal forced it too much and got punished. Even having got the score back to 2-1 with an excellent Oxlade-Chamberlain goal, Arsenal were too gung-ho again.

Apart from possibly playing Nacho Monreal at left-back, the starting XI was exactly the one I’d have picked, it had players in form and seemingly had enough attacking talent to unlock the stubborn defence. But every player to a man seemed to panic after going behind. They weren’t patient, they forced things too much and all contributed to a humbling self-destruction. In hindsight, Arsene Wenger should have shown a bit more restraint in the team selection, and looked to have an extra central midfielder to properly sit alongside Coquelin. It might have made for a slightly boring game, but it wouldn’t have resulted in a 3-1 home defeat. With his experience, and the experiences Arsenal have had in recent seasons, Arsene Wenger and the team shouldn’t have been so naive.

While it is the same problems every season, nine times out of 10 I think Arsenal would have won that game as Giroud would have finished and Welbeck wouldn’t have managed to hit Theo Walcott with with goalkeeper on the ground, but every mistake was a major one and got brutally punished. After such a defeat, I’m expecting a freshening up of the starting line-up on Sunday, and a fairly ugly game as, once again, a team with so much talent has to rebuilt its fragile confidence. Until that fragility goes and hasty pressing of self-destruct button stops, it’s difficult to see Arsenal making a mark in Europe’s top competition.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Arsenal reacquaint themselves with the self-destruct button

  1. Samo samo Arsenal. Since 2010 i compared Wenger and Ferguson, 1 big difference is man management. I rarely see MU players had this self destruction or totally down or lost confidence in the game like Arsenal. Even if they have a bad day, they keep on fighting till the last sweat. Their mentality are double or triple better than Arsenal and that’s why they can handle all big games. That is why Ferguson can sustain his success with MU until retirement.
    For me, Wenger may be better in different way from Ferguson such as business minded, economy, systems, [all kind of elite managerial tasks/macro] but when it come to football-game-tactic-micro management.. Ferguson far better than Wenger. Maybe Wenger success than Ferguson in certain 1-2 years, but overall for 15-20 years, Ferguson win.
    I never see top four – six clubs in EPL frequently conceded more than 5 goals except Arsenal.[maybe MU 1 time with City]. Why Arsenal big club can conceded more than 5 goals? That is why Wenger is not a good man management. He is more an artist than a warrior in football games.We can play beautiful and entertain people but when we need a real fight, we just can’t do it. Someone need to teach our players how to fight and not to entertain. Trust me..Wenger is not that man.

  2. I have never been fond of Welbeck. He seems to be losing the ball at every turn and kept coming into the centre when it would be better to stretch Monaco’s defence. That said, the entire team did not perform with play becoming narrower by the minute. It is not just a disappointing and frustrating game. It was a game that the team should have no qualms when the entire stadium booed them off the pitch.

    1. I think people just so frustrated because the expectation is high but the performance is just like shit. That is a League 2 team performance. It is just a give and take. Fans had too much to swallow that kind of performance since we lost 8-2 to MU until today. A lot of humiliation and destruction done to Arsenal name by this Wenger new teams after the “invincible” era.
      This time you need to give your heart out if you want a support. The players need to be professionalism attitude then only fans will show their attitude. It is not about win or lost but how you show your attitude toward every game that you been paid.
      A small club fans keep on cheering no matter what because they don’t have so much expectation as a big club fans. At least you need to show a proper play or fight to each game what ever your opponents is.

  3. Very disappointing game. Post-match Arsene said that it was a game of 180 minutes but the players got impatient and rush the game (thus vulnerable to counter attack). This indicates to me that he did not manage the team well. They were not drilled to handle different scenarios that are required in a game. I guess the critics had been right all along, Arsenal does not have a Plan B.

    1. He does have plan B when play with City. That plan came out after 10 years. Now when he found this plan B,believe me..he will stick to this plan another 10 years before his plan C reveal. He study too much about a new plan..I think! He is a professor .. Remember?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s